Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemenish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chemenish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced/original research; title is a non-notable neologism, probably made up by the creator of the article. snigbrook (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteSpeedy Delete per nom. WP:WPINAD. B.Rossow talkcontr 17:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Strong delete. Complete BS. Oh, and the original author posted some "links" on my talk page about Youtube videos that supposedly verify this. What a load of crap! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unfortunately contested PROD. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Ale_Jrbtalk 20:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thra aahhht this pony 'n' trap.: This Matheson Lang may 'eaven and 'ell exist, but there's absolutely nuffin' aahhht there abaht it, and nah way ter verify it.[1] --Milowent (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Two Ghits, both of them Wikipedia. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I live in the north of England and I've never heard of it. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it should be deleted, but that's not a valid reason. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I could have repeated the arguments on the number of hits on GNews as usual, but that would have been less exciting. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it should be deleted, but that's not a valid reason. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:MADEUP. Fences&Windows 00:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - Non-notable original research, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 17:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.