Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramón Barthelemy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Ramón Barthelemy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ramón Barthelemy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Assistant prof, seems like WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF to me. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be on a promising career path given his various prestigious fellowships, but he doesn't seem to quite meet WP:NPROF or the GNG. Assistant professorships don't get us anywhere under NPROF crit. 5, and the citation record seems pretty modest: a handful of moderately cited papers don't convince me that crit. 1 is met. The award referenced in the article doesn't seem like the sort of "highly prestigious" thing that would count under crit. 2, and a search doesn't find anything that would satisfy the GNG. I agree with the nom that WP:TOOSOON is probably applicable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF C1. The subject's somewhat highly cited physics paper is also highly coauthored, and the meta-physics papers are based in a different field (with I believe a higher citation standard). Early career awards don't meet WP:NPROF C3. No sign of other criteria. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.